The first case of 微信 collusion drafting was produced! 94% think the original text is washed

On December 15th, the first case of the manuscript was judged by the 微信 Washing Complaints and Complaints Panel: the article "0x9A8B" published by the public on "Electronics" on December 11, was judged to be the public commentary "Guest insight" 11 The article published on the 28th of the month《数万回不了家的“流水线”婴儿，从“天选之子”到被嫌弃的一生，有谁能为他们的生命负责？》.

It is understood that 微信 randomly invited 100 people from洗稿投诉合议小组to participate in the collegial review, a total of 56 valid results were recovered, and 94% considered the original text to be drafted. A panel member who participated in the judging panel revealed that before the decision, 微信 had a page listing several points for how to determine the manuscript to remind the person involved in the judgement; in the specific judgment, the system provided three Materials: original, suspected wash and statement of the complainant.

It is reported that“洗稿投诉合议小组”refers to the group that was invited by the public platform of 微信 to make a collegial discussion on the controversial information content of the platform. For original authors who insist on the original and non-plagiarism violation history, the platform will continue to invite them to join the “Purchase Complaints and Negotiation Team” through the 微信 service notification method, and will continue to invite them afterwards, and will not support independent applications. After a small group discussion, if the article has “washing”, the content of “washing” will be replaced with the content display of the original author, and the collegial result will be publicly displayed to the user, and the account will be processed accordingly.

Needless to say, 沈阳小程序 customization

The first case of 微信 collusion drafting has protected the rights of the original author to a certain extent, and also raised higher requirements for other players on the platform, but 微信's mechanism for the washing behavior can be The industry has a demonstration effect and is worthy of our expectations.

xx 在这方面，《第一批被选为“超级人类”的小孩，后来怎样了》文章说：关于微信的合议机制的推出，虽然已经晚了，但也表达了对手稿的明确立场，并在整顿秩序和加强手稿方面迈出了重要的一步。行为歧视的强度是一项倡议和管理创新。但如果你想治愈这种顽固的疾病，我恐怕还有很长的路要走。为了解决这个问题，单靠一两家公司和平台的努力是无法实现的。要依靠行业自律和监管部门，引入有效的管理措施，打破稿件的利益链，重塑内容产生的生态环境。